India’s involvement in the Fall of Dacca and exploding its first nuclear device prompted Pakistan to develop its nuclear capability. As a result, Pakistan conducted its nuclear tests on May 28, 1998, and became a nuclear-armed country. The day is celebrated every year as Youm-e-Takbeer." It was intended to restore the power equilibrium and establish nuclear deterrence. Nuclear deterrence refers to deterring aggression from rival countries due to the concerns of mass destruction and regional instability. Nuclear weapons are political weapons, not intended for warfighting. Instead, they are used to deter any sort of aggression from rivals.
By Qirat Mirza
From
1998 to until now, South Asia has not witnessed any full-scale war.
However, it can’t curb conventional confrontation between two rivals.
It is evident from the Kargil crises, troops mobilization in 2000, and the
Balakot operation in 2019. Nuclear deterrence is not ample for avoiding other
forms of aggression and resolving conflicts with India. There is still a need
for conventional weapons. Additionally, economic growth, political
stability, diplomacy, and a nation’s faith in defense also play an
imperative role. From 1999 to 2006, both countries engaged in talks to
preserve strategic stability while avoiding nuclear dangers. However, strategic
stability requires that there should be no armed conflict or unresolved issues
leading to a war. In the case of India and Pakistan, Kashmir has been a bone of
contention for years. Despite efforts to resume bilateral relations
between both countries, there has always been a deadlock on
Kashmir.
While
India emphasizes not bringing Kashmir as a condition to resume bilateral talks,
Pakistan can’t stop talking about Kashmir. The Founder of Pakistan,
Quid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah declared Kashmir as the jugular vein of
Pakistan. This doesn’t stop here. various organizations and
people around the globe are advocating for the rights and concerns of the
Kashmiri people. Until now, India and Pakistan have fought three wars over
Kashmir. When India revoked Article 370 to make Kashmir its integral part,
Pakistan ended all diplomatic ties with India. The future of India-Pakistan
relations depends on progress over the Kashmir issue. Additionally, who can say
it can’t balloon conventional confrontation over Kashmir into a
full-fledged nuclear war?
Furthermore,
Analysts believe that the risk of nuclear war has become more apparent since
1998 as Pakistan acquired its nuclear weapons in the same year. For
instance, in 2020 one year after the abrogation of Article
370, India’s Defense minister raised questions
about India’s adherence to its “No First Use Policy”. While
adding to his prior statement, he said ‘we are thinking of reconsidering
this policy”. This is exacerbated more by the fact that
Pakistan doesn’t have a “NO First Use Policy”. However,
Pakistan exercises minimum nuclear deterrence. That same year, the DG ISPR, the
spokesperson of Pakistan’s armed forces recounted that “We will
fight till the last soldier for Kashmir”.
According
to the Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Centre, India has approximately
164 nuclear warheads and has land-based, sea-based, and
air-launch nuclear capabilities. India
has always defended its conventional military buildup by declaring it
a response to the combined military buildup by Pakistan and China. Pakistan has approximately
170 warheads. If the current growth trend
continues, Pakistan’s arsenal could grow to 220 to 250 warheads by
2025. Even a small nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan could kill 20
million people in a week. If a nuclear winter is triggered, nearly 2 billion
people in the developing world would be at risk of death by starvation.
Once
a Western diplomat said that India and Pakistan have enough nuclear bombs to
blow [up] each other many times over. It's going
to be a very dangerous situation if there is ever
a major war between these two countries." Furthermore, for
many years, Pakistan and India were known for keeping their warheads away from
their missiles. However, research conducted by the Stockholm Institute issued
admonitions that technological breakthroughs have exacerbated the risk of
nuclear tensions between both countries. For instance, both countries are
working to acquire nuclear submarine capability. Doing it would make it
unfeasible for both countries to keep missiles away from warheads. In the last
few years, both countries have demonstrated their capabilities to launch
nuclear weapons from sea, thus completing the “triad”: the ability to
launch nuclear weapons from land, air, and sea. India has
the edge, with nuclear-powered submarines that can remain submerged for
extended periods. Although Pakistan's submarines are
conventionally powered, with air-independent propulsion systems that
let them stay underwater longer than before.
This would
eventually put the security and stability of South Asia at stake. To avoid
minor conventional confrontations from ballooning into a nuclear war, the
International Community must pay heed to human rights violations in Indian
Occupied Kashmir. Additionally, the rights of self-determination propped up by
International Law should be respected and granted to the people of Kashmir.
Before Kashmir, like Palestine, becomes a powder keg for relentless genocide,
practical measures need to be taken. It is apparent from the issuance of
60,000 fake domiciles to Indians since 2020, promoting illegal settlements on
the territory. Furthermore, on one occasion in 2019, the Indian plan of
genocide was revealed with the slip of the tongue of an Indian diplomat when he
said India would adopt Israel’s model to ethnically cleanse
Muslims and resettle the Hindu population in Kashmir. Moreover, the matter of
concern is that Kashmir is a nuclear flashpoint between nuclear powers, further
exacerbating the situation. This will impinge on
the region’s security and stability along with
having ramifications for global food security.
The
writer is a student of International Relations at the International Islamic
University, Islamabad, and is currently serving as an intern at the Kashmir
Institute of International Relations.