As
winter tightens its grip on the valleys of Indian illegally occupied Jammu and
Kashmir (IIoJK), the cold enveloping the region is not merely seasonal. It is
juridical and political. It reflects a deliberate freezing of rights, freedoms,
and human dignity through law. The recent dismissal of appeals by senior
Kashmiri political leaders, Masarat Alam Butt, Shabbir Ahmed Shah, and Nayeem
Ahmed Khan, against charges under India’s Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act
(UAPA) is emblematic of this reality. These decisions are not isolated judicial
outcomes. They form part of a wider strategy to criminalize dissent and
foreclose lawful political expression.
By Altaf Hussain Wani
The
UAPA, significantly expanded through amendments in 2008, 2012, and 2019, has
drawn sustained criticism from jurists, civil liberties groups, and UN Special
Rapporteurs. Concerns center on its vague definitions, the effective reversal
of the presumption of innocence, and extraordinarily high thresholds for bail.
In National Investigation Agency v. Zahoor Ahmad
Shah Watali (2019), the Indian Supreme Court held that
courts must presume the prosecution’s allegations to be true at the bail stage.
This ruling normalized prolonged pre-trial incarceration and converted
detention into punishment without conviction.
The
prolonged incarceration of Masarat Alam, detained for years without trial,
exemplifies this pattern. Shabbir Shah’s case is equally stark. He has spent
over five years in prison despite documented and serious health concerns.
Nayeem Khan’s continued detention further underscores the systematic use of
UAPA to incapacitate political leadership. The law’s reach extends beyond
individuals to families. The prosecution of Syed Salahuddin’s sons, Shahid
Yousuf and Syed Shakir, on tenuous terror-financing allegations treats familial
association as evidence. This directly violates the principle of individual
criminal responsibility and underscores UAPA’s function as an instrument of
political suppression rather than counterterrorism.
Parallel to
this legal siege is the relentless military occupation. The report of a youth,
Javed Ahmed Hijam, arrested in Pulwama on the familiar pretext of “providing
logistical support to mujahideen” is a routine entry in the ledger of Kashmir’s
suffering. These cordon-and-search operations (CASOs), now intensified ahead of
India’s Republic Day, are not mere security drills. They are rituals of
collective punishment. Streets are sealed, homes are invaded, and men are
frisked and humiliated in front of their families. This “pervasive and
oppressive” military presence, as termed by the political leaders , turns daily
life into an ordeal, where movement is a negotiation with armed power and
privacy is a forgotten luxury.
This winter,
the material hardships are acute. Amidst this security clampdown, the lack of
civic facilities bites harder. Unreliable electricity, inadequate heating, and
disrupted livelihoods compound the misery. For the nomadic shawl vendors, whose
winter migration to Indian cities is an economic lifeline, the season now
brings a different kind of cold: the hostility of majoritarian extremism. Being
forced to chant “Bharat Mata Ki Jai” or being driven from markets is a brutal
reminder that their identity itself is under assault, their economic survival
contingent on surrendering their dignity and political silence.
The Indian
state’s narrative of “normalcy” and development in Kashmir is brutally
contradicted by this ground reality. What prevails is not peace but a
pacification enforced by over a million troops. The conviction of leaders like
Yasin Malik to life imprisonment, with the state seeking death, sends a clear
message: the demand for the right to self-determination, promised by UN resolutions,
is a punishable crime. The space for political expression has been methodically
eradicated, replaced by the architecture of control—UAPA cases, armed patrols,
and endless checkpoints.
The
psychological toll is immeasurable. Each arrest under dubious charges, each
dismissal of an appeal, each house raid deepens the alienation and trauma of a
population that has lived under conflict for generations. The “silent
suffering,” especially among women who bear the brunt of disappeared, detained,
or martyred family members, constitutes a profound mental health crisis,
largely unaddressed and exacerbated by the constant state of fear.
The
international community’s silence on this ongoing crisis is a failure of moral
and political responsibility. Kashmir is not an internal Indian matter; it is
an internationally recognized dispute whose resolution is essential for
regional peace. The world must look beyond geopolitical calculations and see
the human cost: a people imprisoned in their own land, shivering through a
winter of political disenfranchisement, disempowerment and militarized control.
To break this
chilling stalemate requires urgent intervention. The global community,
particularly the United Nations, must move beyond periodic expressions of
concern. It must actively work to revive a credible, tripartite dialogue
involving India, Pakistan, and genuine Kashmiri leadership to address the
dispute’s root causes. Pressure must be mounted on India to repeal laws like
the UAPA, AFSPA and PSA, demilitarize the region, release political prisoners,
and halt human rights violations.
The winter in
Kashmir will eventually pass, but the deep freeze of oppression will not lift
without concerted external pressure and internal resilience. The courage of the
Kashmiri people, enduring an “open-air prison” for over seven decades, demands
nothing less than a world that finally chooses to see, speak, and act. Their
right to self-determination is not a frozen relic of history; it is the
unextinguished ember that can, and must, thaw the longest winter of their
lives.
The writer is
chairman Kashmir Institute of International Relations and can be reached at: chairman@kiir.org.pk and saleeemwani@hotmail.com, X: @sultan1913