Abstract:
The Kishanganga and Baglihar hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir signify a pivotal expansion in India's hydroelectric power capabilities, but they also pose significant environmental and socio-economic challenges. This study critically examines the ecological impacts of these projects, focusing on alterations in water flow, sedimentation patterns, and aquatic biodiversity. The construction and operation of the Kishanganga and Baglihar dams have led to substantial disruptions in local riverine ecosystems, affecting riparian vegetation, aquatic species, and the intricate food webs within these systems.
Junaid Ashraf
BS IR (6th Semester) IIUI
These
environmental changes have profound implications for local communities,
particularly concerning water availability and agricultural productivity.
Furthermore, the study explores the geopolitical dimensions of these projects,
particularly in the context of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960, which
governs water rights between India and Pakistan. The research highlights the
need for balanced and cooperative water management strategies to address the
ecological and socio-economic challenges posed by these projects. Utilizing a
combination of data analysis and literature review, the study identifies
significant gaps in the existing research, particularly regarding long-term ecological
changes and the socio-economic impacts on local communities. The findings
underscore the importance of sustainable hydropower development that
prioritizes environmental preservation and community well-being. This research
contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between energy
development, environmental health, and socio-economic factors, offering
critical insights for future hydropower projects in the region.
Keywords:
Hydroelectric
projects, riverine ecosystems, aquatic biodiversity, sedimentation, Indus
Waters Treaty, socio-economic, geopolitical, sustainable development,
transboundary water management.
Introduction:
Hydroelectric projects can have significant effects on the environment, especially in areas with abundant and disputed water resources like Jammu and Kashmir. The Kishanganga and Baglihar hydroelectric projects signify an ample increase in India's hydroelectric power generation capabilities. However, their construction has ignited considerable debate due to their substantial impacts on local riverine ecosystems. The construction of these dams has not only altered water flow and sedimentation patterns but has also significantly affected aquatic biodiversity.These alterations have broader implications for both environmental health and local communities, particularly regarding water availability and agricultural productivity. The projects are deeply interweaved with the geopolitical dynamics between India and Pakistan, particularly concerning water rights under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960. This treaty outlines the usage rights of the Indus River and its tributaries, granting Pakistan control over the western rivers, including the Kishanganga and Chenab while allowing India to utilize the eastern rivers.
The Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project (KHEP), initiated in 2007, aims to harness the potential of the Kishanganga River by diverting its flow through a 22 km tunnel to generate an estimated 330 megawatts of electricity. This project has faced extensive opposition due to concerns about its ecological complications, particularly regarding the downstream flow of the river, which is crucial for maintaining the health of the ecosystems in both Indian-administered and Pakistani territories. Similarly, the Baglihar hydroelectric project, located on the Chenab River, claims a capacity of 450 megawatts. While it represents a significant engineering achievement, the operational dynamics of the Baglihar dam can lead to rapid fluctuations in water levels, disrupting the natural habitats of aquatic species and affecting agricultural irrigation in downstream regions of Pakistan. The filling of the dam has been linked to dramatic reductions in water flow during critical agricultural periods, exacerbating food security concerns in the region.
This
study is significant as it provides a comprehensive analysis of the ecological
and socio-economic impacts of the Kishanganga and Baglihar hydroelectric
projects. By examining changes in water flow, sedimentation, and biodiversity,
the research aims to highlight the broader implications for river ecosystems
and local communities. It explores the socio-economic implications for
communities affected by these hydroelectric projects and proposes
recommendations for minimizing negative impacts. The study also addresses the
contentious issue of water rights between India and Pakistan, emphasizing the
need for balanced and cooperative management strategies. The findings are
crucial for informing future hydropower projects and ensuring that energy
development does not come at the expense of environmental and social
well-being.
The
study employs a combination of data analysis and literature reviews. Data
analysis includes reviewing water quality reports, sediment transport studies,
and biodiversity assessments. The theoretical framework for this study is
grounded in ecological theory, ecological impact assessment, water resource
management principles, and sustainable development ethics. By incorporating
concepts such as ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and
transboundary water governance, the framework emphasizes the need for
sustainable practices that balance energy development with environmental
preservation. Despite existing research, there are notable gaps in
understanding the specific impacts of the Kishanganga and Baglihar projects.
These include limited data on long-term ecological changes, insufficient
analysis of sedimentation effects, and a lack of comprehensive studies on
socioeconomic impacts. Addressing these gaps is crucial for developing
effective management strategies and ensuring that future projects minimize
adverse effects. The study faces several limitations, including challenges in
accessing remote areas for field surveys, and potential biases in data sources.
Initial
findings indicate that the Kishanganga and Baglihar projects have significantly
altered water flow patterns, sediment transport, and local ecosystems,
impacting aquatic biodiversity and riparian vegetation that could lead to
habitat loss and species extinction, disrupting the intricate food webs within
these river systems. These changes have broader implications for agriculture,
water availability, and local communities. Furthermore, the socio-economic
consequences for local communities, including displacement and reduced
agricultural productivity, underscore the need for a balanced approach to
energy development that prioritizes ecological reliability and community
well-being. In Conclusion, the Kishanganga and Baglihar hydroelectric projects
in Jammu and Kashmir severely impact local ecosystems by altering water flow,
degrading biodiversity, and threatening the sustainability of indigenous
species and communities.
The
Kishanganga and Baglihar Hydroelectric Projects and their impacts on the local
riverine ecosystems:
The
construction of the Kishanganga and Baglihar hydroelectric projects has brought
about considerable changes in the local riverine ecosystems of Jammu and
Kashmir. These changes include alterations in water flow, shifts in
sedimentation patterns, and significant impacts on the aquatic biodiversity of
the region.
The
Kishanganga hydroelectric project is on the Kishanganga River, also known as
the Neelum River in Pakistan. It is intended to harness the river's power by
diverting water through a tunnel to produce an estimated 330 megawatts of
electricity. However, the project has faced considerable opposition due to
concerns about its potential ecological impact, particularly in terms of the
river's flow and the diverse range of plant and animal life downstream.
The
Baglihar hydroelectric project developed on the majestic Chenab River, stands
as a testament to modern engineering with its impressive 450-megawatt capacity.
Nevertheless, it has sparked concerns about its environmental footprint, especially
about sedimentation and the delicate balance of aquatic ecosystems.
2.1
(a) Impact of Variations in Water Flow on Riverine Ecosystems: A Case Study of
the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project
The
construction of the Kishanganga project is expected to have a notable impact on
the water flow of the Kishanganga River downstream, particularly in the
Pakistani territory.
Reduction
in flow: The anticipated diversion of water is expected to significantly reduce
the flow of the river by as much as 90% in the Pakistani division. As a result,
conservationists warn that this drastic reduction will likely cause a 20-25 km
stretch of the river to freeze during the winter. This will have devastating
impacts on the ecosystem, causing the loss of vital aquatic habitats and
leading to the extinction of various species, including economically important
fish such as brown trout and Triplophysa Kashmiriensis. (Raza 2023), (Wikipedia
Contributors 2023)
Impact
on Downstream Ecosystems: The reduced water flow will not only have a damaging
effect on the diverse ecosystem of aquatic life but will also significantly
influence the riparian vegetation that is reliant on the natural ebb and flow
of the river. This vegetation plays a critical role in supporting biodiversity
and providing essential habitats for a wide range of wildlife species,
including the vulnerable Musk Deer. (Wikipedia Contributors 2023), (Rehman
2023)
2.1
(b) Impact of Variations in Water Flow on Riverine Ecosystems: A Case Study of
the Baglihar Hydroelectric Project
The
construction of the Baglihar Dam has significantly modified the original flow
patterns and dynamics of the Chenab River.
Fluctuating
Water Levels: The Baglihar dam's operational activities can result in swift and
dramatic fluctuations in water levels, profoundly altering the natural
environment for aquatic species. This disruption can have harmful effects on
the delicate balance of the ecosystem. Furthermore, the lessened water flow
during critical agricultural periods poses a significant threat to irrigation
systems in Pakistan, directly endangering food security and the livelihoods of
farmers who rely on the river for sustenance. (Akhtar, n.d.), (Rehman 2023)
Dramatic
Reductions during Key Seasons: The reports have brought to light the fact that
the filling of the Baglihar dam has resulted in a clear decrease in water flow
during the crucial sowing season, causing hardship for farmers in Pakistani
Punjab. This development has encouraged discussions on water rights and the
broader impact of India's hydroelectric projects on Pakistan's water supply.
(Akhtar, n.d.), (Rehman 2023)
2.2
(a) Impact of the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project on Sedimentation Patterns:
Sedimentation,
the process of deposition of sediment, is vital for shaping the habitat and
facilitating nutrient cycling in riverine ecosystems. However, the construction
of dams can disturb the natural flow of sediment in rivers, resulting in
significant ecological effects.
Disruption
of Sediment Transport: The re-direction of water from the Kishanganga River is
expected to disrupt the natural flow of sediment downstream, which is
fundamental for preserving the ecological balance of the entire river
ecosystem. Sediments have a significant role in creating diverse habitats for
fish and other aquatic life. Any interference with the sediment transport could
lead to the erosion of riverbanks and the disappearance of essential habitats,
significantly jeopardizing the biodiversity of aquatic species. (Raza 2023),
(Akhtar, n.d.)
2.2
(b) Impact of the Baglihar Hydroelectric Project on Sedimentation Patterns:
Sediment
Trapping: The construction of the Baglihar dam has a significant impact on the
movement of sediments within the river. By capturing sediments, the dam
disrupts the natural flow of these crucial materials downstream. As a result,
the areas downstream may experience a shortage of sediments, leading to
disruptions in the ecological balance of the river and the habitats it
supports. This can result in the degradation of the natural habitats and the
ecological developments that rely on the consistent flow of sediments. (Akhtar,
n.d.), (Rehman 2023)
2.3
(a) Impact of the Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project on Aquatic Biodiversity:
The
Kishanganga and Baglihar projects are causing prominent alterations in the flow
of water and patterns of sedimentation, which are expected to have extensive
effects on the diverse range of aquatic life in the region.
Extinction
of Species: The estimated reduction in water flow and the formation of ice in
certain sections of the river will bring about disastrous consequences for the
underwater ecosystem. The disappearance of species such as the brown trout and
Triplophysa Kashmiriensis will not only be a loss for the local environment but
will also raise global concerns, given their pivotal role in maintaining the
region's biodiversity. (Wikipedia Contributors 2023), (Rehman 2023)
Disruption
of Food Webs: The decline in aquatic biodiversity can have sweeping
consequences as it disrupts the intricate food webs and can create a domino
effect throughout the entire ecosystem. When important species decline or
disappear, it puts the entire ecological balance at risk, impacting not just
the fish populations but also the birds and mammals that depend on these
species for nutrition. (Rehman 2023), (“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga
Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
2.3
(b) Impact of the Baglihar Hydroelectric Project on Aquatic Biodiversity:
Ecological
Disruption: The Baglihar Dam has caused significant ecological disturbance. The
changes in water quality and flow have impacted the various plant and animal
species that rely on the river's natural conditions. The alteration of habitats
has led to shifts in species composition, with some species thriving while
others have declined or faced extinction. (Rehman 2023), (“Conflicts
Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
Loss
of Habitat: Changes in the way sediment settles and water moves can result in
the disappearance of vital living spaces for many different types of underwater
creatures. This vanishing can have lasting impacts on the variety of life and
the overall well-being of the ecosystem. (Akhtar, n.d.), (Rehman 2023)
The
Socioeconomic and Environmental Implications of Kishanganga and Baglihar
Hydroelectric Projects:
The
construction of these projects has ignited significant debate, especially
regarding their potential effects on the economy and environment of both India
and Pakistan. This comprehensive examination explores the diverse influences of
these dams, shedding light on their impact on regional dynamics, local
societies, and the preservation of the environment.
3.1
(a) Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project (KHEP) & Socio-economic Implications:
The
construction of the KHEP (Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project) has been
controversial, mainly because of its potential impact on water downstream in
Pakistan. This has raised concerns because Pakistan is the lower riparian state
under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) 1960.
Water
Disputes: The Kishanganga River's water diversion has sparked serious
diplomatic tensions between India and Pakistan. Pakistan argues that the
project violates the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), which grants unrestricted use
of the western rivers, including the Kishanganga, to Pakistan. There are concerns
that the dam could potentially decrease water flow to Pakistan by as much as
27%, which would have a detrimental impact on irrigation and agriculture. These
sectors are crucial for the livelihoods of millions of people in the region.
(“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.), (Raza
2023)
Local
Communities: The construction of the KHEP has sparked local opposition and
concerns among communities in the locality of the dam site. Many fear being
displaced from their homes and land, and are dissatisfied with the compensation
being offered. This has led to organized protests against the project. The
compensation packages have been widely criticized for not adequately addressing
the loss of livelihoods, exacerbating existing socio-economic inequalities, and
causing tensions within the affected communities. (“Conflicts Surrounding the
Kishanganga Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.), (Wikipedia Contributors 2023)
Employment
Opportunities: Despite initial expectations for the project to create job
opportunities during its construction phase, local labor unions have indicated
a shortage of employment options for residents. Consequently, there is growing
dissatisfaction among locals who feel marginalized from the economic advantages
that the project was anticipated to bring. (“Conflicts Surrounding the
Kishanganga Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.), (Raza 2023)
3.1
(b) Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project (KHEP) & Environmental Implications:
Ecological
Impact: The construction of the KHEP has sparked widespread environmental
concerns due to its potential impact on the local ecosystems. Environmentalists
and local communities fear that diverting the river's natural flow will disrupt
aquatic life and biodiversity in the area. Reports of pollution and ecological
degradation have emerged, with construction activities being blamed for
chemical disturbances in water quality, leading to protests and calls for
action to address these issues. (Wikipedia Contributors 2023), (Per Steineide
Refseth 2013)
Sustainability
Concerns: The long-term viability of the KHEP is in doubt because the
construction of the dam may alter the natural flow of water and sediment,
potentially causing increased siltation downstream. This could have adverse
effects on water quality and availability for agricultural and domestic use in
Pakistan. (“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,”
n.d.), (Wikipedia Contributors 2023)
3.2
(a) Baglihar Hydroelectric Project & Socio-economic Implications:
The
Baglihar project, like the KHEP, has been a source of dispute between India and
Pakistan. The primary concerns revolve around its adherence to the Indus Waters
Treaty (IWT) and its potential impact on the water flow to Pakistan.
Political
Tensions: The Baglihar project has been a major point of contention between
India and Pakistan, as Pakistan has raised concerns about the dam's design and
its potential impact on water flow. This disagreement has escalated to the
international level, bringing attention to the intricate nature of
water-sharing agreements in the region. The project serves as a symbol of the
larger challenges related to trust and collaboration between the two countries,
with water security emerging as a crucial factor in their bilateral relations.
(Raza 2023), (Bansal 2017)
Impact
on Agriculture: The Baglihar project's potential impact on water flow to
Pakistan is a major concern for the region's agricultural productivity.
Agriculture serves as a vital source of livelihood for a significant portion of
the population in Pakistan. A decrease in water availability due to the dam
could lead to severe socio-economic outcomes, worsening poverty levels, and
increasing food insecurity in the area. (Raza 2023), (Bansal 2017)
Displacement
and Compensation: The Baglihar project, much like the KHEP, has been the
subject of criticism due to its impact on local communities, particularly in
terms of displacement and the adequacy of compensation offered. The failure to
implement effective recovery measures has resulted in social unrest and
discontent among the affected populations. (Bansal 2017)
3.2
(b) Baglihar Hydroelectric Project & Environmental Implications:
Alteration
of Ecosystems: The construction of the Baglihar project has raised concerns
about its impacts on the local environment. Changes in river flows could
disturb natural habitats, influence fish numbers, and adapt the essential
movement of sediment in river systems. Additionally, environmental evaluations
have raised red flags about the potential long-lasting effects on the variety
of species and the services provided by the ecosystem. (Per Steineide Refseth
2013), (Bansal 2017)
Water
Quality Issues: The construction of the dam has sparked concerns regarding the
possibility of heightened pollution and alterations in the water quality
downstream. There are worries that the dam's functioning may result in water
stagnation in specific areas, worsening water quality problems. This could have
far-reaching consequences, impacting the well-being of local communities that
depend on the river for their drinking water and agricultural needs. (Per
Steineide Refseth 2013), (Bansal 2017)
The
Impact of the Kishanganga and Baglihar Hydroelectric Projects on the
Agricultural Practices in Jammu & Kashmir:
4.1
Impact of the Kishanganga Project on Agricultural Practices in the Region:
The
Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project (KHEP) is situated in the Indian-administered
area of Jammu and Kashmir and holds great significance for the agricultural
landscape in the surrounding regions, particularly in Pakistan-administered
Kashmir. This project involves the diversion of water from the Kishanganga
River (known as Neelum in Pakistan) and has been a contentious issue between
India and Pakistan due to its potential impact on water availability for irrigation
and agriculture downstream. (“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam |
Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
4.1
(a) Water Availability and Irrigation Practices:
Water
plays a vital role in agriculture, particularly in a region where farming is
the main source of livelihood for most of the population. The diversion of
water by the Kishanganga project has sparked worries about a potential decrease
in water flow to Pakistan. This is of significant concern as the agricultural
sector in Pakistan heavily depends on the water from the Indus River system.
(“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
Reduced
Water Flow: The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) has granted India the
right to divert water for power generation and has stipulated that a minimum
flow of 9 cubic meters per second must be maintained for downstream users in
Pakistan. However, Pakistan contends that this minimum flow is inadequate to
meet its agricultural needs, which could result in a 27% decrease in water
availability for irrigation in the Neelum Valley and adjacent areas. (Raza
2023), (Rehman 2023)
Impact
on Crop Production: The decrease in available water resources could result in a
decline in agricultural output. Farmers in areas that heavily depend on the
Neelum River for watering their crops might encounter difficulties in
sustaining the production of crops such as rice and maize, which demand
significant amounts of water. This could further worsen the food scarcity in
the area, particularly since agriculture is already stressed by both changes in
climate and population growth. (Rehman 2023)
Shift
in Agricultural Practices: Farmers may face the need to adapt their farming
methods due to fluctuating water availability. This could involve transitioning
to less water-dependent crops or embracing improved irrigation methods like
drip irrigation. Nevertheless, implementing these changes may demand resources
and expertise that might not be easily accessible to all farmers, particularly
those located in rural areas. (Raza 2023)
4.1
(b) Economic Implications:
The agricultural sector in the region is significantly impacted by the Kishanganga project, leading to direct and indirect effects on farmers and local economies. Increased Costs: Due to the limited supply of water, farmers may face increased expenses for irrigation. This could involve investing in more advanced irrigation systems or buying water from other sources, adding financial pressure on smallholder farmers who already operate with slight profit margins. (Rehman 2023)
Market
Dynamics: Changes in agricultural productivity can have a significant impact on
the dynamics of local markets. If crop yields decrease, this can result in
higher prices for agricultural products, which in turn affects both producers
and consumers. As a result, farmers may face challenges in selling their
produce at profitable rates, leading to economic uncertainty in farming
communities. (Rehman 2023)
Employment
Opportunities: The development and functioning of the Kishanganga project have
resulted in the creation of employment opportunities in the local area.
Nevertheless, concerns arise regarding the lasting viability of these jobs,
especially if agricultural productivity decreases. Declining agricultural
output may result in higher levels of unemployment in rural regions, as a
reduced workforce is required for smaller crop yields. (Raza 2023)
4.1
(c) Ecological Effects:
The Kishanganga project's impact on the environment has significant consequences for the agricultural methods employed in the area. Altered Ecosystems: The diversion of the Kishanganga River has the potential to significantly alter the local ecosystems, leading to a disturbance in biodiversity and the delicate natural balance of the environment. The changes in water flow can have far-reaching effects, causing shifts in soil moisture levels that are crucial for agricultural activities. As a result, there is a risk of losing native plant species and the potential negative impact on essential crop production organisms such as pollinators. (“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
Soil
Degradation: Decreased water flow can have damaging effects on soil quality,
such as heightened salinity levels and erosion. These impacts can result in
diminished soil fertility, posing challenges for farmers in sustaining
productive agricultural lands. Gradually, this can lead to reduced agricultural
sustainability and greater dependency on chemical fertilizers, exacerbating
environmental harm. (“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam |
Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
Climate
Resilience: The project’s influence on local water resources is essential for
the region's ability to withstand and adapt to climate change. Changes in water
availability can make it challenging for farmers to confront severe weather
events like droughts or floods, leading to potential crop destruction and
livelihood loss. (Rehman 2023)
4.1
(d) Socio-Political Dynamics:
The Kishanganga project is more than just a feat of engineering; it is complexly connected to the social and political tapestry of the region. Water Rights and Conflicts: The ongoing project has significantly intensified pre-existing tensions between India and Pakistan regarding water rights, as specified in the Indus Waters Treaty. Pakistan's assertion that the project breaches the treaty underscores the vulnerability of water-sharing agreements when national interests are at stake. These heightened tensions have the potential to result in political instability, indirectly impacting agricultural practices by fostering an environment of uncertainty for investment and development. (Rehman 2023), (Raza 2023)
Community
Protests and Local Governance: The Kishanganga project has sparked protests
from local communities who are concerned about being displaced and losing their
means of making a living. These protests highlight larger issues related to
governance and the rights of residents, as they are pushy to have a say in
decisions that have a direct effect on their lives. How local and national
governments choose to address these protests could have a significant impact on
agricultural practices. It may either lead to a more inclusive form of
governance or worsen existing tensions. (“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga
Dam | Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
Cultural
Impacts: The practice of agriculture goes beyond being merely an economic
pursuit; it holds deep cultural significance for numerous communities in the
area. Alterations in agricultural methods as a result of water scarcity have
the potential to cause changes in cultural identities and traditions, as
time-honored farming techniques may be discarded in favor of more financially
lucrative alternatives. (“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam |
Climate-Diplomacy,” n.d.)
4.2
Impact of the Baglihar Project on Agricultural Practices in the Region:
The
Baglihar hydroelectric project, situated along the majestic Chenab River in the
serene Doda district of Jammu and Kashmir, has greatly influenced the
traditional agricultural methods of the region. This impressive run-of-river
project, featuring a towering dam measuring 144.5 meters in height and a vast
reservoir with a capacity of 37.5 million cubic meters, has not only
interrupted the natural flow of the Chenab River but also brought about
significant changes to the delicate ecosystem of the surrounding areas. (Cms
Admin 2006), (admin 2024)
4.2
(a) Changes in Water Availability and Irrigation:
The
Baglihar project has significantly impacted agriculture, particularly in terms
of water availability for irrigation. The project's blockade of the natural
flow of the Chenab River has resulted in a rise in water levels upstream and
has triggered lateral cutting, soil erosion, and land and rock slides. (admin
2024) These changes have led to the submergence of agricultural lands and
disrupted traditional irrigation practices. Moreover, the project has altered
the water cycle within the Chenab River catchment area, diminishing groundwater
recharge and affecting water availability for crops during the dry season.
(admin 2024) Consequently, farmers have had to modify their irrigation methods,
potentially increasing their reliance on groundwater or seeking alternative
water sources.
4.2
(b) Soil Erosion and Land Degradation:
One
of the major issues caused by the project is soil erosion and land degradation.
Due to the reduction in forest cover in the Chenab River catchment area, there
has been an alarming increase in soil erosion on the mountain slopes and a rise
in surface water runoff. (admin 2024)This has led to sediment accumulation in
the reservoir, which has reduced its storage capacity and raised concerns about
potential effects on water quality. The consequences of soil erosion and land
degradation extend to agricultural productivity, as the loss of fertile topsoil
and essential nutrients can severely affect farming. As a result, farmers may
need to consider implementing soil conservation techniques such as terracing or
utilizing cover crops to address these issues and ensure the health of the
soil.
4.2
(c) Crop Damage and Yield Reduction:
The
Baglihar project has caused significant disruption to the ecosystem, resulting
in a rise in landslides and flash floods. (admin 2024) These natural disasters
directly impact crop production, leading to reduced yields and financial losses
for farmers. Furthermore, the submergence of agricultural lands and
fluctuations in water availability may necessitate farmers to transition to
less water-dependent crops or even abandon certain areas entirely.
4.2
(d) Adaptation Strategies and Challenges:
In
response to the significant changes brought about by the Baglihar project,
farmers in the region have been compelled to modify their traditional
agricultural practices. This adjustment may demand embracing innovative
irrigation methods, such as drip irrigation or sprinkler systems, to
efficiently manage water resources. Moreover, farmers might find it necessary
to broaden their range of crop varieties or seek out alternate sources of
income to counterbalance the potential risks associated with the project.
Nonetheless, adapting to these transformations presents challenging obstacles
for farmers, especially those with limited access to resources, information,
and technology. The expenses linked to implementing new irrigation systems or
transitioning to alternative crops can be restrictive, and farmers might lack
the essential expertise and support needed to effectively embrace these
changes.
Key
Findings & Recommendations:
The Kishanganga and Baglihar hydroelectric projects are prime examples of the complex connections between energy development, environmental preservation, and socioeconomic influences, particularly in transboundary water management. While these projects aim to boost India's energy security, it's crucial to consider their impact on river ecosystems, water flow, sedimentation patterns, and aquatic biodiversity. These factors have significant implications for Pakistan, especially regarding water availability, agricultural productivity, and the livelihoods of local communities. The Kishanganga Project has far-reaching implications for agricultural practices in the region, particularly in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Its influence extends beyond mere water diversion, affecting economic stability, ecological health, and socio-political dynamics.
The Baglihar Hydroelectric Project has had far-reaching implications
for agricultural practices in the surrounding region. By disrupting the natural
ecosystem and altering water availability, the project has posed significant
challenges for farmers, leading to changes in irrigation methods, soil
degradation, and crop damage. Adapting to these changes requires a concerted
effort by all stakeholders, including the government, project authorities, and local
communities. The ongoing disputes surrounding these dams emphasize the
necessity of collaborative water management strategies that take into account
the interests of both upstream and downstream states. The experiences gained
from the Kishanganga and Baglihar projects can lay the groundwork for future
hydropower ventures, promoting a well-rounded approach to energy development
that prioritizes the needs of both humans and the environment.
Bibliography
admin. 2024. “Baglihar Project: A Lurking Danger -
Kashmir Times (since 1954): Multi-Media Web News Platform.” Kashmir Times
(since 1954): Multi-Media Web News Platform. - Credible Window of News from
Jammu and Kashmir, South Asia. January 26, 2024. https://kashmirtimes.com/baglihar-project-a-lurking-danger/.
Akhtar, Dr. Shaheen. n.d. “EMERGING CHALLENGES to
INDUS WATERS TREATY Issues of Compliance & Transboundary Impacts of Indian
Hydroprojects on the Western Rivers.” https://irs.org.pk/f310.pdf.
Bansal, Alok. 2017. “Baglihar and Kishanganga:
Problems of Trust | IPCS.” Ipcs.org. 2017. https://www.ipcs.org/comm_select.php?articleNo=1762.
Cms Admin. 2006. “Baglihar Threatens Indus Deal.”
International Water Power. September 12, 2006. https://www.waterpowermagazine.com/analysis/baglihar-threatens-indus-deal/.
“Conflicts Surrounding the Kishanganga Dam |
Climate-Diplomacy.” n.d. Climate-Diplomacy.org. https://climate-diplomacy.org/case-studies/conflicts-surrounding-kishanganga-dam.
Per Steineide Refseth. 2013. “The Indus River Basin,
1999-2008 - an Intellectual History in Hydropolitics.”Pdf, Per Steineide
Refseth. https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/36683/Refseth-Master.pdf?sequence=2.
Raza, Kashif. 2023. “Legal and Political Dimensions
of Kishanganga Hydroelectric Project Issue.” Journal of Development and
Social Sciences 4 (I). https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-i)38.
Rehman, Mariam. 2023. “Kishanganga Project:
Hydro-Politics and Arbitration over the Indus Basin.” Centre for Strategic and
Contemporary Research. August 6, 2023. https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/politics-governance/kishanganga-project-hydro-politics-and-arbitration-over-the-indus-basin/.
Wikipedia Contributors. 2023. “Kishanganga
Hydroelectric Project.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation. August 10, 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kishanganga_Hydroelectric_Project.